[Confirmed] HBP receives PG rating from the MPAA
[Confirmed] HBP receives PG rating from the MPAA UPDATE: The MPAA's official site has been updated with the rating. You can see it by clicking here and searching for Harry Potter. Thanks to Steven for the tip!

Rope Of Silicon and Ain't It Cool News are both reporting that Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince has received a PG rating by the Motion Picture Association of America. Surprising, given that Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix both received PG-13 ratings.

The MPAA rated it PG for "scary images, some violence, language and mild sensuality." We're currently checking this with Warner Brothers to make sure it's legit.

Thanks to Chris, Scott, Geoffrey, and Nizar for the tip!
Posted by Andrew on Jan 7th | 257 Comments
Visitor Comments
Posted by Glitterfrost Jan 7th 2009

Lol, really? Okay. Cool. :)


Posted by smashley63945 Jan 7th 2009

movie please!!!!


Posted by Missy_Lovegood Jan 7th 2009

Wha-? After two PG-13 Harry Potter movies, they (whoever they are :P) are changing it to PG?? Surely this movie is PG-13 with all of the blood (Harry's nose breaking and Sectumsempra), Quidditch being more violent, the Burrow attack, the cursed necklace and a very important character dying... :S


Posted by the7thhorcrux Jan 7th 2009

WHAT!?!?! Not possible... Inferi? SECTUMSEMPRA!!!?? Ho w can this be?


Posted by SaraFilipa Jan 7th 2009

I second the7thhorcrux. Also, even if they cut out those scenes (which makes no sense whatsoever), it's not appropriate. All they want is money... -.-


Posted by ajrome Jan 7th 2009

NO!


Posted by Falstaff Jan 7th 2009

Anyone watch Prince Caspian? There was a lot of talk wondering how that got a PG when the violence clearly was PG-13 level. Seems to me that the WB through that one back at the MPAA's face and got a PG.


Posted by elvindork Jan 7th 2009

WHAT??


Posted by chommy Jan 7th 2009

I'm more concerned with the mild sensuality.


Posted by raverclaw Jan 7th 2009

Geez, that's stupid. Wonder if more people will watch it, though.


Posted by muggleborn444 Jan 7th 2009

this is kind of scaring me....if its rated PG, how many of the things that should have made it PG-13 are being cut out of the film?????


Posted by starfox221 Jan 7th 2009

Glad to see Mugglenet reads their e-mail =) I'll send more tips in the future if I can find them. On topic though, it is kind of strange that they would go for a PG-rating..


Posted by sharkess10 Jan 7th 2009

what....i am so confused....it should be PG - 13.... i guess....


Posted by Lucas Jan 7th 2009

Maybe the mild sensuality will make up for it if it's Hermione...


Posted by hptwilighter Jan 7th 2009

PG?? That's so random. Maybe DH will be G...lol. Anyway, does that mean Sectumsempra's out?


Posted by harrypotteraddict Jan 7th 2009

WHAT?! What about the Burrow attack? The bridge? The Dark Mark? The Inferi? The poisoning? The cursing? The kissing? The Quidditch?! Isn't that enough to earn it a PG-13?!?!!?


Posted by chudleycannons41 Jan 7th 2009

this is kinda weirdddd


Posted by HPBESTEVER_clau_pink Jan 7th 2009

I hope this doesn't mean all the PG-13 stuff is out of the movie... because the book doesn't have so much PG - 13 dtuff ... but i hope it in't a like a little kids moviee... it doesn't bother me if the inferi dark mark bridge kissing and cursing aren't out... i think DH will be R... or ... PG-13... maybee. :)


Posted by kooldude10694 Jan 7th 2009

Man, I still remember the day I was shocked because GOF was announced as a PG-13, and now Half-Blood Prince, a PG????!!!! The movie has to include Sectumsempra, and obviously they aren't gonna make the death too scary. THIS SUCKS! I'm angry....


Posted by Travis Jan 7th 2009

This is surprising. I remember thinking when reading the book that the inferi scene would definitely force it to be pg-13.


Posted by Margaret Jan 7th 2009

Uh, wtf? Seriously, I can't see how the movie could be any good and be rated PG. Let it be a lie! Or let the MPAA have gone blind! Or something...


Posted by rogue416 Jan 7th 2009

wtf? PG? I hope they don't cut so many PG-13 worthy scenes that the movie ends up sucking.


Posted by ginny53 Jan 7th 2009

That's ridiculous. What about the whole Ron Lavender thing going on. And all the fighting?? And well... everything!? Dumbledore dying.... just... what??? I feel like almost everything in that book would make it pg-13. that stinks if all the important stuff is taking out just so that it can be pg. This is sooo stupid.


Posted by samlynne899 Jan 7th 2009

that's weird. but i like the mild sensuality...no other harry movies have that...i hope harry and ginny sensuality? or maybe its all the ron and lavlav snogging.


Posted by Emuhleigh Jan 7th 2009

Eeek. That's scary...very scary..


Posted by liquid_silver Jan 7th 2009

I refuse to believe it until WB confirms it.


Posted by teddysgirl011 Jan 7th 2009

really? hmmm....i don't know what to make of this? i mean.....really? This is the movie with a MAJOR death in it. True Dumbledor's death isn't that graphic but still...... and (as a lot of ppl have said) the inferi, the sectumsempra? hmmm........i guess we'll have to wait to see the movie. hmmmm.........*is confused*


Posted by spiderfairy14 Jan 7th 2009

Wth!! Really! this is sooo not real? C'mon at least PG-13!


Posted by Ravenclaw33 Jan 7th 2009

Rubbish! It is so pg-13! that'a scandal


Posted by Kself482 Jan 7th 2009

NOOO! The book so deserves to be PG-13! It has an epic battle, stuff about splitting souls, and a little child who reminds of the AntiChrist for crying out loud! This HAS to be false! Please...


Posted by twin_hermione Jan 7th 2009

some how I doubt this is true. PG seriously? We'll have to wait for the official report. If it is PG there must be a lot left out....


Posted by Ravenclaw33 Jan 7th 2009

i agree completely-DITCH PG!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Ithilwen Jan 7th 2009

I find this rather doubtful, especially given the presence of Inferi. Hm...waiting for more confirmation first to believe this.


Posted by tbc07 Jan 7th 2009

I don't understand why everyone is making such a big deal out of this... So what if it's rated PG (and FYI, those of you who state WB only did it for the money, are stupid because WB does not rate the movies the MPAA does.) It doesn't matter that it's rated PG...this movie is not going to be toned down AT ALL...we've already heard from the test screeners that it was a very very intense and scary movie most of the time, so I don't know what you're all freaking out about... It's not that big a deal...the movie is going to be amazing (Prince Caspian was rated PG and totally was too intense for that rating it definitely deserved PG-13...maybe the same case with HBP)...don't worry about it...just relax and have more faith.


Posted by Osaka Jan 7th 2009

Keep in mind, everyone, that no one "goes" for a certain rating. You make a movie, and the MPAA then rates the movie based on content. Given that previous Harry Potter movies have been PG-13, I'm sure it wasn't a deliberate choice on Warner Brother's part. Clearly, they aren't afraid of making Harry Potter movies more adult films. Futhermore, I simply doubt the validity of this news item. In the trailers alone, I've seen a lot of things that would legitimize a PG-13 rating (The burrow on fire [tense and scary scenes can require a PG-13 rating--if the MPAA believe that the amount of intensity would terrify children], Fenrir chasing about in the swamp that we briefly see Ginny in, the dark mark, and Dumbledore conjuring fire to, we can only assume, fend off the Inferi). I may be proven wrong, but I full expect in the that when Warner Brother responds they'll set us all straight. That's my prediction; I'm sticking to it.


Posted by Judicar Jan 7th 2009

For this one, I don't think that's a big surprise. Really, it's one of Harry's more "tame" years compared to the other books. That and 75% of HBP dealt with hormones and teenage drama alone. There are a few elements that could throw a PG-13 rating on (notably Sectumsempra) but if the studio can get a lower rating, they'll do it. And things like Sectumsempra can easily be toned down to meet that lower rating, so they'll do it. And it's not as simple as making a movie and then it getting a rating. Filmmakers can initially plan what they're going for while shooting a movie, or the studio can "plan" for them and ensure their product is certified for whatever rating they want it to get.


Posted by nekotheninja Jan 7th 2009

either they cut a bunch of stuff out or this shows that the standard for rating has changed drastically.


Posted by hornskickbrass07 Jan 7th 2009

I do think that they made it PG just so parents won't think it's too bad for their children and it'll sell more tickets. cuz remembering the book there are quite a bit of things that i think would qualify it to be PG-13 at least. a lot of people are talking about Sectumsempra being one thing, also the Inferi being another, not to mention Dumbledore dying and the whole part with the drinking out of the bowl to get at the locket. that's certainly going to be quite frightening for children. But hopefully it's all just a fib because I'm seriously wondering about the validity of this story....


Posted by XdumbledoresXarmyX Jan 7th 2009

hmm... Im having a hard time picturing HBP as PG, especially since GoF and OotP were PG-13. Oh well, whatever the rating I just want to see the movie!


Posted by MUHAHAHA Jan 7th 2009

Rubbish!!


Posted by magic_owl1 Jan 7th 2009

.....What???


Posted by Potterrrrr Jan 7th 2009

Oh c'mon...PG??! what rubbish!


Posted by phoenixknighter Jan 7th 2009

DON'T LISTEN TO THIS GUYS! THIS IS A LIE! MPAA HAS BEEN TRYING TO GIVE HARRY POTTER A PG RATING SINCE GOF... THEY GAVE THAT PG AT FIRST, BEFORE IT WAS RELUCTANTLY CHANGED TO PG-13, SAME WITH OOTP, EXCEPT THAT ONE WAS JUST TOO DARK AND GRIM TO BE PG. NOW THEY'RE AT IT AGAIN! I BET YOU IT'S GONNA CHANGE AGAIN... SOME PEOPLE STILL DON'T WANNA EXCEPT THE TRUTH THAT HARRY POTTER IS NO LONGER A CHILD'S PLAY MOVIE.


Posted by CFplayer19 Jan 7th 2009

Grrr....What ever, at least the movies actually going to come out this time...


Posted by Potterrrrr Jan 7th 2009

Can we honestly believe Voldemort as a threat if he


Posted by Potterrrrr Jan 7th 2009

*Can we honestly believe Voldemort as a threat if he's been given a PG rating? It will be interesting to see if it does turn out to be PG. And what DH will be.


Posted by Fawkes_Forever Jan 7th 2009

Oh I hope this is just a rumor. There's absolutely no way they will do justice to the movie with a PG rating! The attacks on Hogwarts and the Burrow, Dumbledore's death, Snape, Harry and Malfoy, The Horcruxes, the cave???? No way!


Posted by FantasyWriterVB Jan 7th 2009

Oh God, I hope this isn't true!!!!! Why on earth would they make this one PG when Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix where PG-13. There are things in Half-Blood Prince that are much darker and more mature than in those two. Things like the Inferi and Dumbledore's death would be a lot harder for younger kids to get through than anything that happened in #4 and #5. One scene that definitely comes to mind would be the Sectumsempra (I know it's not spelled right) scene. Malfoy is going to be on the floor bleeding! Hopefully the MPAA gets their act together and rates this properly! They need to get it through their thick heads--after Chamber of Secrets, HARRY POTTER IS NOT A KIDS FRANCHISE!!!! THEY ARE DARK AND MATURE!


Posted by Slytherin15 Jan 7th 2009

wow that little picture of draco is really hot! lol anyway....i dont really care what its rated. man, if it was rated R i would still go and see it anyway! lol


Posted by kpotter24 Jan 7th 2009

I guess Sectumsempra is extremely dulled down. Or Warner Bros. got right up in the face of the MPAA, which, well, would be despicable.




Wait! View more news stories in our News Archive.




Translate


MuggleNet is an unofficial Harry Potter fan site. Please email us if you have any questions or concerns. MuggleNet's original layouts were designed and created by Navy. All subsequent layouts by Dylan Spartz.

© 1999-2009 MuggleNet.com. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | COPPA Policy | Feedback | Credits
Random Addresses

896 muggles currently online







Poll
Is Dumbledore right that Hogwarts sorts its students into Houses too soon - while the kids are too young?

Updates
Today's Updates
· Updated Ultimate Edition DVD section [November 21]
Recent Updates
· Updated Crazy Caption Contest [November 15]
· Updated the Half-Blood Prince DVD info page [November 10]
· Updated Crazy Caption Contest [November 8]
Mail

Quotes
Harry, you're worse than Ron... Well, no, you're not.

Hermione Granger
Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 26, Page 572

See Another Quote
Big News
(10/01) - Happy 10th Birthday, MuggleNet!
(9/30) - HBP breaks $300 million mark in US
(9/25) - JK Rowling is now a Twitter user!
(9/17) - SS and COS Ultimate Editions arriving December 8th too
(9/17) - HBP DVD to hit U.S. stores on December 8
(9/15) - Wizarding World to open Spring 2010, rides confirmed
Release Dates
The Exhibition,
Boston opening:

October 25th, 2009
Half-Blood Prince DVD:
December 8th, 2009
Wizarding World:
Spring 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 1:
November 19th, 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 2:
July 15th, 2011

Advertisement